In this article, Ed Welch argues that theology profoundly affects practical counseling methodology. Welch raises questions about one component of Adams’s counseling model: the characterization of “flesh” as neuro-physiological programming that must be reprogrammed. Welch concludes that this significantly shapes Adams’s portrayal of how a person changes and how the counseling process unfolds and offers an alternative interpretation.
This article is available to read in the issue below. Current JBC subscriber? Login to access the full-text article.
