by Mike Emlet
I decided to write a short series on training biblical counselors, more specifically, on the CCEF internship, which I have either co-directed or directed for the last six years. The internship is an opportunity for a select number of students to put into practice what they have been learning in the classroom and in other aspects of their lives. Wisdom gained by supervised experience is critical in the formation of a biblical counselor. While the learning curve never stops with regard to developing your counseling competence, a season of more intensive training is invaluable to develop and refine your care of people.
Today I’ll focus on the structure of our internship, including some of the readings I have the interns do. The most important aspect of training is—no surprise here—the actual face-to-face counseling that interns do. There is no substitute for that “hot seat.” Interacting with case studies, reading counseling transcripts, even observing live counseling, as helpful as they are, pale in comparison to the actual experience of wrestling with how to bring the gospel to the person, the couple, or the family sitting with you. You have to decide what to say or not to say. You have to prayerfully consider the direction of the session. And so on.
But receiving mentoring and supervision are critical to honing this raw experience. For example, no one taught me how to serve a tennis ball. I simply picked up ball and racket and practiced serving again and again, doing what felt most natural. Although I developed a pretty good serve, eventually I hit a plateau and sought help. A friend and tennis pro gave me a lesson, and suddenly I found that I was doing it all wrong! I had to unlearn what I had practiced for so many years before actually advancing in my skills. Mere practice was not enough! My practice needed supervision. So, a critical aspect of training is having your counseling supervised by someone who has more experience. This is so essential—counseling is inherently a “private” ministry and you can easily, by default or by design, fall into a “lone ranger” mentality.
In addition to doing counseling and receiving supervision, the interns develop a growth plan at the beginning of the year, following an assessment of strengths and weaknesses in several areas, including (1) their character qualities, (2) their baseline knowledge (of people, problems, the gospel), and (3) their skills (communication & relationship-building, conceptualizing & developing a gospel-centered plan). From this self-assessment each intern sets specific objectives/goals for the year, which are revisited at the mid-point and end of the internship.
Lastly, I encourage the interns to read on a broad range of topics, expecting that they will, in addition, read more focally on the types of problems they are seeing in counseling. (The interns will have read many of the CCEF authored series of books during their classroom experience). Here are some of my required readings:
• Brian Baird, The Internship, Practicum, and Field Placement Handbook
• Samuel Knapp & Leon VandeCreek, Practical Ethics for Psychologists: A Positive Approach.
• David Powlison, “How Healthy is Your Preparation?” The Journal of Biblical Counseling, 14, no. 3, Spring 1996.
• David Powlison, “Familial Counseling: The Paradigm for Counselor-Counselee Relationships in 1 Thessalonians 5” The Journal of Biblical Counseling 25, no. 1, Winter 2007.
• Timothy Lane, “Walking the Razor’s Edge of Truth and Love in Personal Ministry” The Journal of Biblical Counseling 22, no. 1, Fall 2003.
• Winston Smith, “Dawning Insights and Changing Agendas” The Journal of Biblical Counseling 21, no. 1, Fall 2002.
• Diane Langberg, Counseling Survivors of Sexual Abuse
Though the first two resources are written from a secular perspective, they introduce the intern to important nuts and bolts counseling issues such as confidentiality, “dual relationships”, record-keeping and other administrative aspects of counseling, life-endangering counselees, and child-abuse reporting. Tim Lane and Winston Smith’s articles are annotated counseling transcripts and give a feel for the process of counseling.
David’s articles (and in general, many articles in The Journal of Biblical Counseling) provide a wealth of conceptual and methodological wisdom. Finally, Diane Langberg’s book is essential reading for anyone who works with sexually abused counselees.
While there are other components to our internship, that’s a start! If you’ve had an internship experience:
• what did you find helpful?
• what do you think are key components of hands-on training for biblical counselors?
• what resources have you found helpful for your growth as a counselor?
In my next post I’ll talk about the process of supervision.
Comments
Mike, great post. Glad to hear how you are continuing to refine the hands-on portion of the CCEF education. These are great resources.
I would think that one of the riches you all have is the live supervision aspect of training--of observing interns in action through the one-way mirror (or video feed) and giving instant feedback. Ever thought of the "bug in the ear" idea where the supervisor offers brief directions to the intern right during the session?
This "bug in the ear" method of live supervision is qualitatively different than the reflecting team approach. The reflecting team works against the grain of counselor-counselee hierarchy by giving the counselee(s) an opportunity to hear the thoughts and impact the counselees have had on the team. And the lead counselor also becomes fodder for these reflections. The reflecting team approach has a stimulating effect on the counseling process and infuses encouragement, support, and gracious curiosity directly into the counseling hour. With that said, I do agree with the suggestion behind Phil's "bug in the ear" question. It provides immediate support and guidance to the counselor and when done well is not a distraction to the counseling process. This method would be a great contribution to supervision at CCEF.
Thanks for your comment. Interestingly, we did that during my family practice residency program during my "behavioral medicine" rotation. A psychologist and several grad students would watch me counsel through a one way mirror and periodically call the telephone in the room to make suggestions. We haven't done that at CCEF. I wonder if providing such live direction may actually inhibit the intern from developing flexibility. Who's to say that the direction I might go in a session is the wisest one?! I could see it most beneficial if the intern-counselor was really struggling--e.g. difficulty engaging the counselee, a volatile counselee, etc. For a variation on this idea see my next post where I'll talk about "reflecting teams."
Speaking as an intern, I don't know how I would have handled direct intervention from a supervisor in counseling this year, but I suspect two things:
-I would have been intimidated by it (as I was when I did a reflecting session as Mike describes in the next post) and had to overcome that and
-I would have been tempted to treat it like a life saver in rough seas and clung to that for answers and direction. I think this would have been the harder to the two to overcome.
Those cautions being given, I would give a great deal to have a mini-Mike Emlet on my shoulder in every session!